May Data Shows Food Insecurity Rising in America

May 30, 2026    Reports this week indicate an increase in food insecurity among lower-income houses with children in the United States.

On May 27, 2026, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York wrote:  “We find a remarkable increase in food insecurity, particularly among lower-educated and lower-income households and households with young children. We document a contemporaneous increase in pessimism among the same groups, along with a sharp decline in job-finding expectations.”  and:  “The greater financial strain due to the high cost of living, combined with the expiration of pandemic-era aid (such as expanded SNAP benefits), have led to renewed concerns about food insecurity among those at the bottom of the K-shape.”

The Federal Reserves’ chart at right shows how the blue data points for February 2026 show greater dip in savings, and meals missed than in prior years.

CommonDreams.org reports how:  “The New York Fed’s analysis came amid a flurry of new data showing that rising inflation, now at a three-year high, is eroding Americans’ paychecks and causing personal savings rates to plummet as households are forced to spend more on gas, food, and other basics.  …the nonprofit research group Equitable Growth pointed to “an important milestone: Household incomes are now down year-over-year. American households had more money to spend in April of 2025.”

The Food Research & Action Center on May 28, 2026 wrote “Families are skipping meals, relying on food banks, and turning to SNAP to get by. Hunger is rising and Congress cannot look away.” https://t.co/ImAFSuTJSg

In other words, tens of millions of Americans are more hungry now than in past years.

Note:  Hunger Notes previously reported:

  • * The 2023 USDA Household Food Security data showed prevalence rose from 10.5% in 2020 to 13.5% in 2023, an increase of just under 5 million households — about 47.5 million Americans.
  • *  Repeated in an August 2025 note: “About 13.5% of U.S. households or nearly 18 million families experienced food insecurity in 2023”.
  • *  January 2026 analysis noted food insecurity “has been on the rise in the U.S. for the past two decades, 17% from 2001 to 2023.”  We reported how  “In 2026, cuts in the SNAP program enacted in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, were estimated to eliminate SNAP assistance for millions of Americans, may further increase food insecurity”.

May 28 = World Hunger Day

May 28, 2026     May 28 was World Hunger day, inspiring many to take action to reduce malnutrition.  The overarching theme for this year’s global campaign is “The End of Hunger is in Our Hands”. 

The World Hunger Day initiative was founded in 2011 by The Hunger Project, a global non-profit organization established in 1977.

While many global awareness days focus heavily on immediate crisis relief and the distribution of emergency food aid, the original intent behind establishing World Hunger Day was to shift the global narrative toward sustainability and self-reliance.  Organizations like Islamic Relief have utilized today to issue a formal warning that the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal of “Zero Hunger by 2030” is rapidly slipping out of reach due to localized aid funding cuts and war-related supply chain disruptions, particularly noting that humanitarian aid is currently meeting only a tiny fraction of the acute need in places like Somalia.

In South Africa, the day serves as the climax of a national week of mobilization organized by the Union Against Hunger (UAH), which declared May 25–30 as Food Justice Week.  International service networks, such as local Lions Clubs, are executing targeted community supply runs today, routing fresh fruits and vegetables directly to underfunded early-childhood crèches and community kitchens to combat localized child wasting and stunting.

The worst levels are concentrated in three bands:

  • * The Horn of Africa and East Africa – Somalia, South Sudan, Burundi, Ethiopia, and Sudan
  • *  Central and West Africa – Democratic Republic of Congo, Chad, Niger, Central African Republic, Nigeria, and Madagascar
  • *  Conflict hotspots outside Africa – Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria, Haiti, and North Korea.

In Haiti:  nearly 277,000 children aged 6 to 59 months are facing or expected to face acute malnutrition.  In Kenya, the number of children aged 6 to 59 months requiring treatment for malnutrition between April 2025 and March 2026 is estimated to be 741,883.  In Ethiopia,~900,000 severely wasted children under 5 are estimated, nationally.

In the United States, food banks are feeling an intense squeeze. Daily living costs are so high that even families with full-time jobs are showing up at pantries just to make it to the end of the month.

The United Nations (UN) often sees significant legislative and health policy momentum occur in tandem with the day. For instance, the UN’s World Health Assembly (the decision-making body of the World Health Organization) regularly approves key nutrition-focused resolutions regarding persistent global stunting, wasting, and anemia around late May, intentionally capitalizing on the heightened public awareness surrounding World Hunger Day.

The UN’s 2025 Hunger Hotspots report flags the same places, naming Sudan, Yemen, Afghanistan, and South Sudan as the world’s most vulnerable, with 24.6 million Sudanese facing crisis-phase food insecurity.  Global hunger actually fell to 8.2% in 2024, but Africa and western Asia saw hunger rise.

World Vision cites 673 million people in the world facing hunger.

  • Action Against Hunger focuses heavily on treating and preventing acute malnutrition, often launching corporate and public partnerships on this day to fund nutritional programs.

  • World Vision & Compassion International utilize the day to run child-focused sponsorship campaigns, highlighting the specific impacts of food scarcity on early childhood development and maternal health.

  • Student resources for learning about world hunger can be found on this site, for instance:  https://www.worldhunger.org/lesson-plans-on-hunger-and-food-insecurity/
  • and https://www.worldhunger.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Understanding-Global-Hunger-Fact-Sheet-3-1.pdf

– Contributed by WHES board member, Steven Hansch

Opinion: School Meals to Combat Hunger

May 27, 2026    by Nadira Kabir

Rethinking Summer Break: School Meals, Hunger, and American Families

Earlier this month, I saw a news segment about public schools in Loudoun County, Virginia — a large suburban school district near Washington, D.C. — exploring the possibility of moving to a year-round academic calendar. The discussion reflected a broader debate taking place across parts of the United States as educators and policymakers continue searching for ways to address lingering COVID-19-era learning loss and the “summer slide” that can leave students academically behind when they return to school in the fall.

As I read more about the issue, I found strong opinions on both sides. Some families and educators see year-round schooling as a valuable tool that could provide greater consistency for students while also helping working parents who struggle with long summer childcare gaps. Others worry it could limit opportunities for teenagers to work summer jobs, attend camps, travel, or simply experience a traditional summer break.

But there is another question that deserves far more attention: What would a year-round school calendar mean for hunger in America?

For millions of children in the United States, school is not just a place for learning. It is also where they receive some of the most reliable and nutritious meals of their day. Nearly 30 million children participate in federally funded school breakfast and lunch programs during the academic year. Depending on the school district, students may receive breakfasts such as cereal, fruit, yogurt, eggs, or milk, while lunches often include sandwiches, pasta, rice dishes, vegetables, fruit, and protein options designed to meet federal nutrition standards.

When schools close for summer vacation, many families suddenly face a sharp increase in grocery expenses. During the summer months, parents are responsible for providing additional meals each day while also managing higher childcare costs. Many families quietly describe summer as one of the hardest financial stretches of the year, especially as food prices continue to rise across the country.

Government-funded summer meal programs do exist and play a critical role, but access can be inconsistent. In 2024, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Summer Food Service Program reached 2.8 million children at approximately 36,000 meal sites nationwide — far fewer than the number of students served during the regular school year. Transportation barriers limited operating hours, lack of nearby meal sites, and the expiration of some pandemic-era flexibilities have all reduced participation for many families.

That is why newer initiatives like Summer EBT (Electronic Benefit Transfer), also known as SUN Bucks, are so important. Created as a permanent federal program in 2024 after being piloted during the COVID-19 pandemic, SUN Bucks provides eligible families with grocery assistance during the summer months when school meals are unavailable. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that 21 million children could benefit from the program, which provides families approximately $120 per child over the summer to help purchase food. Research has shown these programs can reduce child hunger, improve diet quality, and help stabilize household budgets during one of the most financially difficult periods of the year.

This conversation is also unfolding at a time when policymakers are increasingly recognizing schools as an essential part of America’s broader nutrition safety net. In recent years, several U.S. states have expanded access to universal free school meals, while the federal government has strengthened summer nutrition programs introduced during the pandemic. Rising concern about inflation, childhood food insecurity, and family economic stress has pushed school meal policy more prominently into national discussions about public health and poverty reduction.

A more balanced year-round school calendar could potentially reduce the long gaps during which children lose access to dependable meals. It could also provide additional stability for working parents, reduce learning disruption, improve student routines, and lessen periods of heightened food insecurity that many families quietly experience each summer.

The debate over year-round schooling should not focus solely on academics or childcare. It should also include food security, child well-being, and the growing role schools play as part of the nation’s social safety net.

If designed thoughtfully, changes to school calendars could become one important part of a broader strategy to reduce childhood hunger, support working families, and strengthen child well-being in the United States.

In Memoriam: Nick Haan of the Integrated Phase Classification System

May 26, 2026      Nicholas Haan, one of the innovative leaders in food security and humanitarian action passed away on December 2, 2025.  He dedicated his life to combating global hunger and strengthening food security systems in crisis zones.

He was a co-founder of the international humanitarian NGO, Field Ready, which publishes its memory of him here.    In it, co-founder Eric James says “We bonded over our passion for improving the hardest places and our frustration with things not working better.”

Raised in California, he earned his Bachelor of Science in Genetics from U.C. Berkeley, and went on to earn a Ph.D. in Geography, a Master’s in Development Economics/International Development, and a Master’s in GIS & Remote Sensing, all from Clark University.

His deep international perspective began as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Kenya, where he taught science in a remote village and became fluent in Swahili.  He made history alongside his kayaking partner as the first person to paddle the entire lengths of both Lake Victoria (a 500 km expedition) and Lake Turkana.

Over more than three decades, Nick specialized in food security, developing groundbreaking approaches that combined data analytics, geographic information systems, and supply-chain resilience to prevent famine. He is celebrated globally as the creator of the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) System. What began as a localized data solution to map crises in Somalia is now the undisputed international standard led by the FAO, guiding billions of dollars in emergency funding across more than 30 countries

Later in his career, he was a faculty Fellow at Singularity University in Silicon Valley and previously the Vice President and Faculty Chair of Impact.

He authored influential papers and two books on adaptive food systems in fragile states. His innovative “anticipatory aid” model, delivering support before crises peak, is now considered a standard in the field.  See: this publication about information systems for food resilience.

He is one of the creators of the international standard for classifying the severity of food insecurity, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) System which started in Somalia, and is led by FAO.  He was the lead technical advisor to the UN’s Joint Interagency Analysis Framework (JIAF), which provides essential information to allocate over $50 Billion per year in humanitarian aid. Nicholas has been one of the 5 members of the global Famine Review Committee, which makes the independent determination as to whether a place is officially classified as being in ‘Famine’.  A year ago, Nick wrote about the IPC on Linked-in:

“The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) is celebrating its 20th anniversary of informing decisions to end hunger. Thank you to the countless people who contributed to the IPC’s technical development, believed in it, and supported it–especially in the very early days when it was just “a crazy idea”. Here are just a few of those idea-stage contributors from 20 years ago: Cindy Holleman, Thomas Gabrielle, Noreen Prendiville, Yusuf Mohamed, Ali Duale, Mark Smulders, Wolfgang Herbinger, Mohamed Aw-Dahir, Sidow Addouand, and Luca Alinovi. Thank you to all the thousands of IPC practitioners around the world, all the IPC Global Partner Agencies, and the IPC technical development experts who continue to evolve the IPC. Ending hunger requires a collective effort. It’s doable.”

A video of his explaining the IPC system is available at:  https://youtu.be/BKELLoj_41g

He is survived by his wife Mariam, and siblings Mary Catherine and Annie. Beyond his professional achievements, Nick was known for his deep humility, dry wit, and a boundless spirit of adventure.

See:  https://www.fieldready.org/post/nick-haan-in-memoriam

and an obituary at Devex

 -Contributed by Steven Hansch for Hunger Notes

New Food for Peace Programming by the U.S. Department of Agriculture

May 24, 2026    BACKGROUND:   The primary way that the United States government, working with nonprofits, has fought hunger and malnutrition around the world has been through the U.S. Food for Peace program (originally Public Law 480, or PL 480), which began in 1954 and was expanded by President Kennedy in 1961, at which time it took on the name Food for Peace (FFP). Over seven decades, it has reached roughly 4 billion people in 150 countries through a mix of emergency relief and longer‑term development projects. Annual funding has typically ranged from $1.2–2 billion in recent years for the core Title II program (the main grant‑based humanitarian component), though overall international food assistance outlays have averaged $2–2.6 billion, fluctuating with global needs.

The structure and flow of resources for FFP begin with Congress, where appropriations come through agriculture and foreign operations bills. In its early history, most FFP aid went to “development,” but over time the balance has shifted toward emergencies. The main food commodities provided by the United States have been wheat, rice, sorghum, corn‑soy blends, beans, peas, lentils, vegetable oil, and ready‑to‑use supplemental foods. These are purchased competitively from U.S. farmers and producers and often bagged on ocean freighters bound for Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.

RECENT ADMINISRATIVE SHIFTS:   After the Trump Administration dissolved USAID in 2025, FFP planning and administration moved temporarily to the State Department and then, in late 2025, to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, with a strong “America First” focus on buying American‑grown foods. In December 2025, USDA and the U.S. Department of State signed an interagency agreement for USDA to take over FFP. USDA has long supervised other in‑kind international food aid programs, including the school‑feeding‑focused McGovern‑Dole Food for Education and the development‑focused Food for Progress (FFPr) programs, each delivered via partnerships with NGOs and the U.N. World Food Programme.

For many months it had been unclear how USDA would redesign FFP, how it would work with other organizations to deliver aid, and where. Then, in early May 2026, USDA announced a $350 million allocation of foods to WFP. In response, U.S. Wheat Associates announced that it “welcomes the announcement of the award of 20,000 metric tons (MT) (735,000 bushels) for emergency feeding programs under the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) administration of the FFP program.”

NEW OFFERINGS

The new May 2026 Notice of Funding Opportunities published by USDA for NGO proposals sets out three reforms USDA has applied to the inherited portfolio:

  • *-100% U.S. origin for every commodity procured.
  • *-Strict traceability of every taxpayer dollar to guard against fraud, waste, and diversion.
  • *-“Offboarding and graduating” criteria, so that Title II funding “prioritizes emergency and in‑need geographies rather than forever‑aid countries.”

At present, the geographic scope has narrowed. NGO applications can only be submitted for seven countries: Democratic Republic of the Congo, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Haiti, Kenya, and Rwanda—a notable contraction from the broader Title II caseload USAID historically managed. Award sizes range from $20 million to $200 million, with USDA anticipating seven to fourteen awards out of $357 million in available federal funding, and a performance period of 18 to 24 months. The application submission deadline was June 12, 2026. Eligible applicants include public or private organizations, including intergovernmental organizations, language that explicitly keeps WFP and similar multilateral partners involved, while foreign governments are excluded.

With the large‑scale defunding of U.S. NGOs and other aid partners in 2025, intense competition for these new FFP program awards is expected.  NGOs such as CARE, CRS, World Vision, Mercy Corps, Save the Children and Action Against Hunger applied for FFP grants.

At the same time, USDA is layering the program on top of its existing Food for Progress (FFPr) framework. Separate from Title II FFP, the new FY26 Food for Progress solicitation to NGOs—released last week, closing July 6, 2026, with awards expected by late September—makes up to $226 million available across seven countries: Bangladesh, Bolivia, Ecuador, Morocco, Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, with awards of $28–35 million over four‑to‑five‑year performance periods. Food for Progress operates on a monetization model authorized under the Food Security Act of 1985 (7 U.S.C. § 1736o) in which the USDA buys U.S. commodities domestically and ships them overseas, the NGO sells them in emerging markets, and the NGO uses the proceeds to fund agricultural development.  Monetization used to be standard as well for FFP programs particularly in the 1990s.

Both of these competitions for bids are concurrent with USDA funding opportunities for school feeding (McGovern‑Dole).

See also:  USDA:  https://www.fas.usda.gov/programs/food-peace

https://alliancetoendhunger.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/FINAL-FY27-ATEH-Senate-Agriculture-Appropriations-Letter-1.pdf

and:  https://www.devex.com/news/house-locks-food-for-peace-into-usda-with-50-commodity-requirement-112420

A primer from the Congressional Research Service here

New Lancet Commission Report about Health, Conflict & Forced Displacement

May 21, 2026     The new study, Health in a World of Crises and Impunity, by the Johns Hopkins – Lancet Commission about Health, Conflict & Forced Displacement, was published this week in the Lancet Journal, with two dozen main authors (commission members), led by Dr. Paul Spiegel.  It critiques the current ways that humanitarian aid flows as “unfit for purpose” because it relies on politicized funding models that ration survival rather than saving lives.

The “Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health-Lancet Commission” worked for almost three years in leading up to the publication on May 19, 2026 on the Lancet journal’s website, accompanied this week by a launch event in Geneva.  The Commission comprises 42 authors from 20 countries, nearly all academics from universities, some with prior field experience. It includes no representatives from private industry, governments, digital health or technology companies, the military, or financial institutions.

Their 76-page report also notes “Conflict disrupts food production, markets, livelihoods, and humanitarian access, undermining household coping mechanisms and leading to acute and chronic undernutrition among displaced populations and host communities alike.”  Hunger follows from economic harms and job loss:  “Most conflict-affected populations have unstable or no income, affecting 78% of IDPs in Afghanistan and 70% in Iraq in 2022. In Sudan, unemployment in urban households increased by more than ten-fold after the conflict began.”  For example, refugees often lack access to legal employment in countries of asylum.

While the study addresses food and nutrition, it does so only to a limited degree, placing hunger and malnutrition within a broader public health context. In its historical review, it highlights high malnutrition rates in Sudan, Yemen, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The report notes: “Undernutrition is a central pathway through which conflict increases mortality, contributing to more than half of infectious disease deaths globally in children.” Malnutrition significantly raises the likelihood of dying from communicable diseases such as malaria or measles.

Poor nutritional status, the Commission finds, “weakens immune responses, reduces vaccine effectiveness, and prolongs recovery from infection and injury.” It adds: “Recurrent displacement and prolonged food insecurity contribute to wasting, stunting, and micronutrient deficiencies, with long-term consequences for physical growth, cognitive development, and future health.”

The Commission report has many recommendations about reforming the aid system overall, but few that are specifically about food systems, resilience, agriculture, supply chains of recovery foods (such as RUTF), food fortification, school feeding, or other anti-famine programs.  The report largely ignores food aid except to criticize its availability in Gaza, and to diminish it in comparison with cash hand-outs, though the report notes the World Food Programme’s large role in humanitarian aid.

In an accompanying editorial in the same issue of the Lancet (shown above), the editors summarize the findings, including a call to “invert power by shifting resources and decision making to affected populations, making external leadership exceptional, and strengthening nationally led health and social protection systems.”  And then concludes: “Creating an effective community-centred humanitarian system that provides a more just, robust, and sustainable future needs to be managed carefully and responsibly. “

The Commission names climate as both driver and amplifier:

  • * Droughts, dust storms, and floods drive food insecurity, resource competition, and erosion of coping strategies in Somalia, South Sudan, Afghanistan, and the Sahel
  • *  Climate impacts “interact with pre-existing political, economic, and social vulnerabilities, pushing fragile contexts beyond critical thresholds”
  • *  Women particularly affected where they “have limited access to material, social, and institutional resources to cope with, absorb, and recover from climate-related shocks”

Most of the report talks at a higher level. A key finding and recommendation:  “Humanitarian health action remains overly focused on short-term service delivery rather than sustaining health systems across crisis cycles. Fragmentation, disrupted financing, workforce losses, weak integration, and weak digital foundations undermine continuity, quality, and resilience, especially in protracted crises. Emerging technologies and artificial intelligence offer important opportunities to improve early warning, triage, supply chains, clinical decision support, and system planning, but without equitable access, regulation, and accountability they may also deepen exclusion and risk. The way forward is to prioritise health systems protection, ensure continuity and quality of care, integrate humanitarian and national systems where feasible, and invest in preparedness, workforce capacity, climate-resilient services, and ethically governed digital and artificial intelligence capacities that support more resilient, adaptive, and accountable health systems.”

Many readers of the report were pleased to see a vision for a “humanitarian reset.”

The authors try to be bold and do not shy away from controversy.  For example, they call for one big UN agency for humanitarian aid, not the many independent agencies with distinctive mandates seen now.  Repeatedly the report refers to “global health governance and “humanitarian architecture” as if there is now one coordinated system in place that is ill-conceived, as opposed to an ecosystem of independent actors each pushing progress in distinct ways.  While acknowledging the history of humanitarian aid, and in particular groups like UNHCR, World Heath Organization, and the Red Cross, it gives little attention to the thousands of initiatives pioneered by individuals or independent nonprofit or voluntary organizations, directly helping communities in need.

The Commission lumps a lot of “humanitarian” assistance into one concept but does not discriminate between natural disasters and conflict-related crises.  The authors argue that all aid should conform to national policies, even if the government in question are at war with groups of their own citizens.

The report’s strong push for massively expanded multipurpose cash assistance does not address funding sources or potential trade-offs with service provision, vaccination campaigns, food aid to fight famine, shelter materials, etc.

Some readers found the tone strident.  For example the word “must” appears 86 times, giving the impression that the authors are issuing commands without specifying to whom they are directed.

Other launch events are scheduled in other cities.

Supplementary appendix includes

The New Humanitarian reviews the report here.

Numerous podcasts feature the study.  Johns Hopkins’ 20 minute podcast about this can be found here.   

 

 

In Memoriam: Charlie Sykes, CARE Leader and Food Aid Advocate

May 16, 2026    Charlie Sykes, who defined a life well lived, passed away at 92 years of age, on May 8.   He is survived by his wife, Anya, two children who both pursued careers in international aid (his daughter, Agnieszka and Chris) and four grandchildren:  Sasha, Coline, Lazlo, and Marek.

Anya Sykes wrote Charlie “lived a rich and meaningful life.”

Charlie spent 34 years with the private volunteer organization, CARE USA.  After early postings in Greece (Field Representative) and Algeria (Deputy Director, 1961–63), he was Country Director successively for Poland, Pakistan, India, Egypt (1964–1980), and Dominican Republic (1978-1980).

In the 1960s, Charlie took on one of the largest aid programs in the world, in India where CARE (then the largest aid agency in the world) managed feeding programs for children in schools.  Dan Shaugnessy was with USAID in India at the time and remembers:  “He directed some amazing and very successful CARE programs there that were jointly funded, including the huge CARE midday meals program, Project Poshak, the Balahar blended foods project, and other innovative programs.”

Colleague Franesca Nelson reflects:  “Charlie’s unwavering commitment to nourish the hungry made perhaps the most significant contribution to the nutritional wellbeing of children in the twentieth century  through CARE’s school feeding programs around the world. He was a visionary, …and most of all a wonderful human being.”

After his years managing large CARE programs in India and Pakistan, Charlie shifted to Washington, DC, working in close coordination with CARE’s President, Dr. Philip Johnston (who passed away three years ago).  From 1980 to 1994 he served as CARE’s Vice President for Public Policy — the head of CARE’s Washington, DC office and its principal lobbyist on Capitol Hill.  As Executive Vice President of CARE, Charlie was one of the most influential proponents of aid, shaping how Congress framed assistance legislation and appropriations.  He was the lead voice among nonprofits in fighting for anti-hunger programs and food aid.

Former CARE Emergency Coordinator, Tom Alcedo writes:  “Charlie always took the time to check with the field to ensure their position and interest were being considered, thus resulted in many positive outcomes, especially related to USAID and other USG funding. …During my time in Peru,  Charlie was especially effective in getting our country office authorization to monetize excess farm commodities and program those funds to assist hundreds of thousands of people living in poverty.  Charlie will be missed.”

Interviewed by management guru, Peter Drucker, Charlie explained:  The most important thing in working with government is patience and cultural respect. Non-profits must be careful when working with other cultural groups. A leader must get to know an organization before collaborating with it

He collabrated closely with other NGOs in the Coalition for Food Aid.

Shaugnessy again:  “He was a major proponent of NGO’s working with national and local governments and not trying to do things on their own. He believed NGO food aid could only be successful if it was carried out as a partnership with the host government, and he proved it with those successful programs. He carried that belief into later assignments including Egypt, Care New York, Care Washington, DC and finally as a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the 1990’s.”

Sykes was named a 1991 recipients of the Presidential End Hunger Award.

Ellen Levinson worked with him in the Coalition for Food Aid and remembers:  “Driven by his knowledge of hunger’s devastating and generational impact, Charlie was instrumental in building a broad-based, national constituency for global food aid. He was both my mentor and a colleague, beloved for his warmth, insights, and dedication.”

After serving as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, in the Refugee Bureau of the Department of State during the Bill Clinton presidency, which included travel to refugee camps in Africa, Charlie then accepted and served for over ten years from 2001-2011 – first as Treasurer, then Chair, and then as a regular Trustee of the international aid agency, Partners for Development (PFD).

Executive Director Jack Marrkand remembers:  “Charlie had a deft touch in avoiding micro-management on operational matters but still ensuring that PfD was staying true to its mission and its overarching strategic plan.    He was greatly respected by his colleagues on the board from whom he was able to elicit helpful input and advice.”

Fellow PFD board member and long-time friend, Wasiq Khan (sitting next to Charlie in the photo at right) remembers:  “Charlie had this saint-like beatific quality to him.  It was obvious when one was in his physical presence that he left his ego somewhere else and forgot to retrieve it.    ….  I think that quality of being above the fray, above self-dealing of any sort, was what gave Charlie the respect of his peers.  It was the way Charlie listened patiently and always with profound empathy and genuine positive interest that drew so many of us to seek his counsel and company…. Wherever he went, he wanted to know where people were from, what their lives were like, how history had shaped their journeys.  Charlie read voraciously  and liked nothing more than  chatting about a great book, a fascinating trip somewhere, or encounters he had had with interesting people.  The world never ceased to fascinate. … he was a very free person.  His mind could focus on the curious, the beautiful, the uncanny.”

Donna Ellis of PFD (shown with Charlie at right) says that he “was the kind of person who understood the balance between being a strong leader and remaining approachable. He was incredibly impactful holding a position of authority but still made a point to lead with warmth and a genuine smile.”

Armin Bušatlić, a Bosnian, ran the local Bosnia program implemented under Charlie’s tenure, and remembers how “dedicated he was in helping us handle the project crisis we faced; he clearly cared a lot about the work and did a lot of good for the region.”

PFD director William Graham recalls:  “I am glad I had a chance to work with him.   Charlie was easy going, well informed about the Bosnia program and I appreciated his guidance and feedback.”  When Graham needed help getting his Macedonian wife immigration status, Charlie and his wife provided the critical support.  “Tanja and I are forever grateful to Anya and Charlie for their support and guidance.”  Charlie was proud of his wife Anya ‘s legal work, usually on behalf of immigrants , with AYUDA for many years.

Charlie was always an athlete, playing basketball and, into his later years, tennis with his friends from the World Bank and PFD.  One of them, Stephen O’Brien, remembers:   “On the tennis courts at the Arlington YMCA….was where he dominated!  With his height and innate athletic ability he was virtually unbeatable by the rest of us. But we changed partners from set to set so at least once per match one could count on playing as Charlie’s partner and winning! 

Jack Marrkand again:  “Up until quite recently Charlie always stayed in touch with occasional calls and letters politely requesting updates about both work and family. At a lunch some years ago, Charlie gave me a copy of the book, “Black Ball Tales,” whose opening chapter profiles his father, Frank (Doc) Sykes.”

In 2025, a history of Doc Sykes was published, “Dream Merchant of the Perfect Game, the Life and Legacy of Frank Doc Sykes,”  by Bernard McKenna.  Doc Sykes does not appear in Major League Baseball statistics because African Americans were not allowed in that league at that time, despite the fact that his pitching record of 30 wins in a season with a no-hitter, which is better than Dizzy Dean who had 30 wins but not a no-hitter.  No other pitcher in the last 120 years has accomplished that.  One generation removed from slavery, Doc Sykes attended Atlanta Baptist College (now Morehouse College) and then earned his degree from Howard University’s dental/medical school, a rare feat of parallel excellence, since he was simultaneously a major-league-caliber pitcher. He effectively ran two demanding professional careers at once, athlete and physician, in an era when either was rare.

Charlie was deeply proud of his famous father, shown at right, one of the greatest American baseball pitchers of all time, who pitched a no-hitter playing for the Baltimore Black Sox, with a career 3.5 ERA over 15 competitive seasons.

Known as “Doc Sykes” he challenged the segregationist policies of the time. He fought for the integration of juries nationally beginning with the Scottsborro trial in Alabama where he testified for the  nine young African-American boys in 1931 facing an all-white jury.  Considered seminal in the advancement of U.S.  judicial equality, the Scottsboro trials were held after two white women, falsely accused nine boys, ages 12 to 20, of rape in order to justify their own whereabouts illegally onboard an interstate cargo train.  Doc Sykes’ testimony along with the whole trial experience later influenced novelist Harper Lee when she wrote To Kill a Mockingbird, a best-seller, and which was rendered into one of the most important movies of all time, and won 8 Academy Awards including “best picture” in 1963.

In the Scottsboro trials, the accused’s collective guilt was pre-judged by the public, with newspaper headlines assuming their responsibility before all-white juries tried, convicted and sentenced to death all but one defendant in a matter of a day.   Doc (in fact he was a dentist) Sykes testified about the qualifications of Black residents to serve on juries, presenting a list of around 200 qualified Black potential jurors in the area.  In doing so he challenged the systematic exclusion of Black citizens from jury pools (and thus the all-white juries), which violated fair trial rights. His testimony helped highlight pervasive racial discrimination in jury selection.  Very soon thereafter, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (e.g., Powell v. Alabama in 1932 and Norris v. Alabama in 1935) that defendants were entitled to fair jury selection processes, advancing equal protection under the law.

The Scotssboro cases exposed the deep-seated racial biases of the Southern legal system to the world. Seeing how the machinery of justice could be entirely subverted by racial prejudice left a permanent impression on novelist Lee. When she set out to write her masterpiece in the late 1950s, the Scottsboro trials served as her historical blueprint for the systemic injustice she wanted to critique in To Kill a Mockingbird.

The model of Doc Sykes standing up for racial justice influenced Charlie to fight for humanitarian themes around the world, a life of service in and out of government. During his years with CARE, the nonprofit distributed some 12 million metric tons of food aid to some 150 million people, mostly children.

Jack Marrkand again:  “It was a privilege to know Charlie Sykes for many years and to be guided and inspired by his commitment, unfailing optimism, and wisdom.”

Wasiq Khan, again, sums up the views of many, “We were drawn to Charlie because we wanted to be just a little bit more like him: handsome and athletic into his eighties, great conversation on almost any topic, and the feeling that you were heard and understood by someone you trusted deeply.”

-Contributed by WHES Board member Steven Hansch

Roundtable: The Future of America’s Aid for Basic Education of Children

May 14, 2026     The Future of American Foreign Assistance for Basic Education was a roundtable held on June 12, 2025 among some forty-eight international education experts convened together over Zoom by the Global Coalition for Education-US, the Basic Education Coalition, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, George Washington University, and the World Hunger Education Service (WHES) – the publisher of Hunger Notes.

It sought to chart a path forward for America’s assistance to child education in lower and middle income countries.

It was held in the context of a major disruption to America’s ongoing support to basic education around the world.  The US had been the world’s largest bilateral donor for basic education, annually reaching over 34 million learners, training 2.9 million teachers, and distributing 174 million textbooks. Programs covered early grade reading, education in emergencies, disability inclusion, and teacher capacity building across more than 50 countries.  The abrupt termination in early 2025 of 163 of 165 USAID education programs decimated implementing organizations, cost nearly 20,000 American jobs, and prompted parallel cuts by other donors including the UK.

US comparative advantages in supporting basic education:  Participants identified early grade reading expertise, global field presence, strong higher education networks, convening power, catalytic leverage of donor funds, and leadership in evidence generation and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as areas where the US stands apart.

Key recommendations for future aid looking ahead 5-10 years:

  • Embed basic education within the restructured U.S. State Department programming for aid
  • Shift further toward locally-led, government-owned programs rather than parallel systems
  • Break down sectoral funding silos to enable whole-of-child approaches linking education, nutrition, and health
  • Expand the timelines of individual programs to ten years to allow systemic change
  • Invest in AI and technology while ensuring equity and accessibility
  • Preserve and publicly catalog institutional knowledge at risk of being lost.
  • Restore funding for education to FY2024 levels and comply with the Congressional READ Act

Participants agreed a follow-on roundtable should include voices from recipient-country governments and local organizations to complete the picture.  In the meantime, the sponsors have been conducting additional research, field interviews with local educational organizations, and planning additional publications.

Download the summary report here.

UPDATE:  From Aid On the Hill, July 28, 2026:

“Support for global basic education has long been bipartisan. Yet in 2025, the administration terminated 163 of 165 USAID-funded education programs, and its July 2025 rescission clawed back 100% of education funding appropriated that year. As of May 30, 2026, the U.S. government (USG) has only obligated $125.26 million of foreign assistance funding for education programs this fiscal year (FY.) $85 million has gone to Jordan and some funding has been disbursed among a variety of small Peace Corps projects, but most of the $691.5 million Congress appropriated for FY26 basic and secondary education seems to be unspent.

That’s a sharp contrast to FY24, when the USG obligated $1.48 billion for education overseas, $977 million of which was specifically dedicated to basic education. This is no small sum of money, but it is a relative bargain when you consider that the Fairfax County Public Schools approved a budget of $4.1 billion for FY 2027. For less than half of what it takes to educate the approximately 177,000 primary and secondary students enrolled in public schools in one Virginia suburb, USAID reached more than 36 million children and youth with foundational skills programs and formal and nonformal education programming in FY23, including more than 19.4 million young women and girls.

Education has long-term payouts. Each extra year spent learning foundational reading and math leads to an increase of 9 percent in lifetime earnings. Researchers estimate aid cuts could cost affected children $164 billion in future income. This is money that won’t circulate into local economies or buy U.S. goods. Increased schooling also correlates with lower rates of violence, including armed conflict. That’s especially urgent as an estimated 290 million students globally risk losing quality instruction due to donor pullbacks. During the pandemic, a single year of school closures cost students the equivalent of 1.1 years of learning—a preview of what funding gaps could mean, especially for students with disabilities, girls, and children in conflict zones.  In December 2024, Congress voted to reauthorize the Reinforcing Education Accountability in Development (READ) Act with broad bipartisan support, including from then-Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) alongside 80 other co-sponsors. Earlier this year, 110 members of the House of Representatives also signed a bipartisan letter in support of international basic education funding. The House’s FY27 bill still includes $691.5 million for basic education.   Restoring U.S. funding to multilateral partnerships like the Global Partnership for Education and Education Cannot Wait, which serves children in conflict and disaster zones, would let the U.S. move money quickly to organizations with a track record of results—without foreclosing broader reform discussions. “

– The roundtable moderation, organizing and write-up by Steven Hansch of WHES

 

Malnutrition & Death Risks Rise in Bangladesh

May 11, 2026           Bangladesh’s leading newspaper, Prothom Alo, reported this week about a concerning decline in child health following decades of improvement, specifically regarding nutrition and measles. Health professionals have long recognized the insidious risks for children who are both malnourished and infected with measles; specifically, measles infection is significantly more fatal in children suffering from malnutrition.

According to reports from Prothom Alo, published from Dhaka, Bangladesh has recorded 19,161 suspected measles cases and 2,973 laboratory-confirmed cases across 58 of its 64 districts, resulting in 166 suspected deaths. Three-quarters of these cases involved children under five years of age. Furthermore, two-thirds of the infected children had received no measles vaccine at all—a major failure in public health coverage.  see:  https://en.prothomalo.com/bangladesh/pr0qimrtyr

Health experts warn that fatalities will likely continue to climb for several more weeks. The Lancet corroborates this trend, noting that the Infectious Diseases Hospital in Dhaka admitted 560 suspected measles cases in the first three months of 2026, compared to just 69 cases in all of 2025.  (The Lancet)

In this reporting, Prothom Alo correctly identifies malnutrition, Vitamin A deficiency, declining breastfeeding rates, and missed deworming as compounding or co-risk factors of disease and death, as supported by medical literature. While Bangladesh’s child health had improved over many decades, and achieved over 92% first-dose measles vaccine coverage by the mid-2010s, the program has become weak, irregular, and delayed in recent years. For instance, the measles vaccination drive scheduled for June 2024 was delayed by the deadly public protests that toppled then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.

In the long run, chronic malnutrition—measured by stunting (low height-for-age)—has improved, falling from roughly 50% in 2000 to around 24% by 2022, representing a major achievement. Wasting (low weight-for-height) similarly declined from 17% to roughly 9.8% by 2019.

However, recent data show a concerning reversal. The Bangladesh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) 2025 found that wasting among children under five has climbed to 12.5%, up from 9.8%, indicating a steep rise in acute malnutrition. Nutritional health is heavily dependent on surveillance, growth monitoring, and optimal feeding practices, such as exclusive breastfeeding for infants up to six months of age.  Worryingly, exclusive breastfeeding, a critical health practice, has declined by 12% in recent years.

Note:  since this article was published, the Government of Bangladesh has announced a new nation-wide drive to immunize against measles.

-Contributed by Steven Hansch

Fridtjof Nansen: Polar Explorer turned Hunger Activist

May 10, 2026     By Lani Marquez

My husband and I recently visited Oslo, Norway, a beautiful city surrounded by the Oslo Fjord. One of the many very interesting museums we visited there was the Fram Polar Exploration Museum, which houses Norway’s most famous polar ship, the Fram, which sailed to both the North and South Poles.  The ship was designed by the Norwegian scientist Fridtjof Nansen (1861-1930) and launched in 1892.

Nansen had gained fame while pursuing a doctorate in Zoology when at the age of 27, he led a six-month expedition in 1888 to be the first to successfully cross Greenland on skis. He published two books about the journey with his own photographs and drawings, bringing him international fame. He then set his sights on being the first person to reach the North Pole.

Forcing ships through the Arctic ice to reach the North Pole had been tried and had failed many times in the 1800s. But in 1884, a Norwegian professor of meteorology, Henrik Mohn, had put forward a theory of an east-west current over the Arctic Ocean when the remains of the American expedition ship Jeannette were found by the Greenland coast after the ship had been crushed in the ice and had sunk sunk near the New Siberian Islands in 1881.  Nansen noted this and related it to the driftwood from Siberia that he had seen in the ice off Greenland.

Nansen conceived the plan of building a ship “so small and so strong as possible … that it was improbable that it could be destroyed by the ice”.  With such a ship he believed that he could drift over or very near to the North Pole.  In 1893, he and his crew prepared for a two-year journey in which they would let the Fram get frozen in the drift ice north of Siberia with the hope that the currents would carry the ship to reach the pole. While they did not reach the pole, the expedition returned home safely, and Nansen later sailed on the Fram on an expedition to reach the South Pole. He did not reach that goal either. (Robert Peary became the first person to reach the North Pole in 1909, and Roald Amundsen the South Pole in 1911.)

The story of Nansen’s polar expeditions was fascinating enough, but what really captivated me about this man was his humanitarian work.

Upon his return to Norway after his polar expeditions, Nansen became Norway’s first ambassador to Britain, and in 1917 led a Norwegian delegation to the United States to seek grain aid for Norway, since the country had depended on imports of grain from Germany and Russia before the first World War due to the very low proportion of its land that is arable and since most of the country is made up of mountains, forests, and glaciers.  Soon afterwards, horrified by the slaughter of World War I, Nansen became a champion for the League of Nations and attended the Versailles Peace Conference in 1919 which helped shape it.

In 1920, the League of Nations appointed Nansen as High Commissioner in charge of the arrangements for the safe exchange of some 250,000 German and other foreign prisoners of war held by the Russians and some 200,000 Russian prisoners of war held in Germany.

At the same time as the prisoner exchange was being organized, the new Soviet Union was experiencing widespread famine. Nansen arranged for food, clothing, and medicines to be provided to the prisoners of war on Soviet territory and appealed for food aid for the Soviet Union. When Western governments refused to provide such aid to the Communist government, Nansen toured Europe and the United States to raise private donations to fund food for starving people in the Soviet Union.

He argued in the League of Nations for a £5 million loan to address the Russian famine, but his pleas were denied. Nansen estimated that 7 million people died in the Soviet Union as a result of the famine—more than twice the population of Norway at the time.  Nansen led relief efforts as High Commissioner for Relief in Russia for the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and associated organizations, after the League of Nations declined official involvement due to distrust of the Soviet government. His work combined advocacy, logistics, fundraising, and on-the-ground aid distribution.

Through the Nansen Mission (involving Red Cross branches from multiple countries and groups like Save the Children), he helped set up free canteens at orphanages, railway stations, and factories. Field kitchens (hundreds deployed) provided daily rations like half a liter of soup and over 100 grams of bread per person. The effort served hundreds of millions of meals overall.

“The difficult is what takes a little time, the impossible is what takes a little longer”
— Fridtjof Nansen

After that, in 1922, the League of Nations appointed Nansen as its First High Commissioner for Refugees, the first High Commissioner for Refugees (what would later become UNHCR), where he continued to use his fame as a polar explorer and diplomat to call attention to the victims of famine and genocide in Russia, Ukraine, and Armenia. In 1922, Nansen received the Nobel Peace Prize for his tireless work for refugees in Europe after the war.

In his biography Nansen: The Explorer as Hero, Roland Huntford wrote, “Nansen is among the few really worthy winners of the Peace Prize, although he is probably the one who spent the shortest time earning it.”  Nansen spent the prize money on the purchase of tractors and the establishment of model farms to develop agricultural improvements in Russia.

Nansen’s legacy as a diplomat and hunger activist is worth remembering today.  His Nobel Prize recognized this work alongside his refugee initiatives. He approached it with the same determination he showed in polar exploration—practical, innovative, and relentless. His legacy influenced modern humanitarian organizations like UNHCR.

see also:  https://www.unhcr.org/il/en/about-fridtjof-nansen-unhcr-israel