Hunger in Haiti

April 28, 2026:  Over the last six years, the food crisis in Haiti has grown steadily worse.  In 2019–2020, around 3.7 million Haitians were in IPC Phase 3 or above. By 2022–2023, that was approaching 4.7 million — nearly half the population. The most recent UN Integrated Phase Classification system analysis shows 5.7 million people (more than half the population) facing high levels of acute food insecurity, with 1.9 million in IPC Phase 4 (Emergency)

Historically, gang violence in Haiti was largely concentrated in specific slums of Port-au-Prince. While devastating for those communities, the national food supply chain, which relies heavily on imports through the capital’s port, remained somewhat functional.  Between October 2024 and June 2025, gang violence expanded westward into the Artibonite and Centre Departments, where 92,000 and 147,000 people were displaced respectively. By early 2025, the violence had also expanded into previously untouched areas of the country, and gangs began expanding north, south and east toward the Dominican Republic border, with the apparent goal of controlling key roads used for illegal weapons trafficking.

 Haiti imports over 70% of its rice and wheat but gangs now control key maritime and overland routes , strangling the entire country’s supply chain.  The Port of Port-au-Prince is blocked, forcing rerouting to Cap-Haïtien, raising costs.

Agricultural output in the Artibonite is down by at least 48%, according to the technical coordinator at the Artibonite Valley Development Organization. Gangs have taken over irrigation canals that feed the valley, leaving fields barren. Agriculture has stopped entirely in areas like Petite Rivière, Verrettes, and Pont-Sondé, where fields lie fallow and are overrun by weeds.   Gangs control irrigation systems (e.g., in Liancourt, Verrettes), forcing farmers to pay “taxes” for water or share their harvest.  Major markets (e.g., Croix-des-Bossales) are >80% non-functional.

UN World Food Program analysis using European Space Agency satellite imagery found up to 3,000 hectares of Artibonite farmland abandoned in 2023 compared to 2018, and hunger in these areas jumped from 40% to 57% in a single year.

According to ACLED, instances of sociopolitical violence almost doubled in three years , from 455 events in 2020 to 874 in 2023. The number of violent events in January 2024 was more than 70% higher than January 2023, and more than 60% above the five-year average.  As a result, over 1.4 million people are displaced (double the number from just a year ago), overwhelming host communities.  More than 5,600 people were killed in 2024 alone. Between October 2024 and June 2025, another 4,864 people were killed.

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) reports that 75% of households cannot afford health services, and nearly 50% of the population survives on less than $3 a day.

In this 2026 cycle, UNICEF has targeted over 129,000 children (aged 6–59 months) for treatment of Severe Acute Malnutrition.

Aid agencies have been continuously trying to provide life-saving assistance.

  • Action Against Hunger US is involved in Haiti. They support populations affected by violence and displacement, delivering critical food assistance and cash support in the Nord-Ouest region. In Nord-Est and Sud, their focus is on preventing malnutrition through targeted interventions. In Port-au-Prince, they provide vocational training, treat children suffering from malnutrition, and offer primary healthcare services to over 30,000 people.
  • Catholic Relief Services (CRS) provides food assistance.
  • CARE provides food to displaced populations.
  • Partners In Health (PIH/Zanmi Lasante): PIH deploys mobile food clinics staffed with medical professionals and community health workers to sites in the Artibonite region. They seek to identify malnourished children early so treatment can be delivered before health problems become fatal
  • World Vision. World Vision is active in Haiti with child-focused hunger work, including school meals and other food support. Recent World Vision materials also describe food packages and support tied to the hunger crisis in Haiti.
  • Meds & Food for Kids (MFK). This is a particularly important nutrition-focused Haiti organization. MFK produces therapeutic and supplemental foods in Haiti and works with Haitian clinics to treat malnourished infants and toddlers; it also runs school-feeding support with Vita Mamba

New Global Report on Food Crises, 2026

April 26, 2026

The 2026 Global Report on Food Crises (GRFC), jointly published on April 24 by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Food Programme (WFP), and the Global Network Against Food Crises, estimates that some 35.5 million children were acutely malnourished across 23 nutrition crisis countries.  “This tenth edition… reveals an alarming reality: hunger is increasingly being used as a weapon of war.”  

Ending hunger is a test of our shared humanity. It is a test we cannot fail.” the U.N. Secretary-General wrote in the Foreword.

In 2025, approximately 266 million people across 47 countries and territories faced crises or acute food insecurity, requiring urgent humanitarian assistance.  The report discusses rates of malnutrition based on medical clinic screening in Gaza and western Sudan, including El Fasher and Kadugli.   Much of the rest of the Sudan is also seen as at risk.

The Global Network Against Food Crises itself is described as an alliance including the UN, EU, Germany’s BMZ, UK FCDO, Ireland, g7+, and other governmental/non-governmental agencies.

Comparing reports over the years, the trajectory from 2020 to 2025 is stark.  In 2020, approximately 155 million people faced high levels of acute food insecurity) across 55 countries, already a sharp rise from 105 million in 2016.  By 2025, that figure stood at 266 million across 47 countries, though the 2026 report explicitly cautions that the apparent drop from the 2023 peak of 282 million partly reflects reduced country coverage rather than genuine improvement. The share of the analyzed population in acute food insecurity nearly doubled from about 11 percent in 2016 to nearly 23 percent in 2025, and had already crossed 21 percent by 2020.

In 2019 and 2020, David Beasley, as the Executive Director of the World Food Programme (WFP), highlighted the risk of multiple concurrent famines, while the organization was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2020.  Beasley delivered the Nobel lecture where he called for action to prevent widespread starvation.    In 2020, the primary crisis concentration was already in a familiar set of countries, Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria, the Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, which the 2026 report notes have been among the ten largest food crises for most of the decade.

Myanmar [Burma] and South Sudan were newly classified as very severe nutrition crises in 2026, categories they did not hold in the earlier period.

Meanwhile, some populations showed meaningful improvement. Bangladesh saw a significant 32 percent decrease in acutely food-insecure people between 2024 and 2025, and Syria reduced its share from 39 to 29 percent of the population — though both remained at alarming absolute levels.

The report covers various causes of malnutrition, including war and climate. Weather extremes had grown enormously as a driver — from 15 countries affecting 15.7 million people in 2020 to 16 countries affecting 87.5 million people in 2025, a roughly five-fold increase in affected population. The 2023–2024 El Niño, described as one of the strongest on record, drove much of this, devastating Southern Africa in particular.

The report and its annexes reviewed methods.  For instance, WFP conducted 800,000 survey interviews in 2025, a 30 percent reduction from 1.1 million the prior year. FAO’s Data in Emergencies surveys fell 31 percent, from about 170,000 to 118,000 interviews.  An ongoing Acute Food Insecurity Trends Study was specifically designed to correct for temporal, methodological, population, and spatial omission biases that make year-to-year comparisons unreliable. This work was not yet in place for the 2020 edition. Additionally, the 2026 report notes specific methodology changes in individual countries — for instance, Zimbabwe’s IPC methodology changed between periods, and Uganda shifted from FEWS NET to IPC classification, adding 3.3 million people to Phase 3 counts simply through the methodological switch.

Access the report:

https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/86067cbb-9396-4e7d-8d19-e60ad00d2f73/content

Technical notes:  https://www.fightfoodcrises.net/sites/default/files/resource/file/2026_GRFC_APP_TECHNOTES.pdf

https://www.fightfoodcrises.net/global-report-food-crises

https://reliefweb.int/report/world/2026-joint-analysis-global-report-food-crises

Past reports:

https://www.fightfoodcrises.net/knowledge-hub/search?f%5B0%5D=series%3A39

World Bank President Seeks Funds for Crisis Response

At the annual World Bank/IMF annual meeting held April 13–18, 2026, remarks and speeches by the World Bank President, Ajay Banga, addressed the current crises in the world affecting agriculture, fertilizer and increased risks to lower income countries. Banga announced that the World Bank is preparing to mobilize $80 billion to $100 billion in funding over the next 15 months to support countries harmed by the US/Iran war, particularly those facing high energy prices and supply chain disruptions. 

He explained that $20 billion to $25 billion could be made available immediately through existing “crisis response windows” without requiring new approvals.  He warned that the US/Iran conflict could reduce global GDP growth by  to over 1 percentage, depending on its duration, and advised leaders to prioritize reining in inflation in the short term before tackling long-term economic growth.

He framed his comments around ““multiple overlapping global shocks” (war, debt, inflation, supply chains).  These shocks were repeatedly linked to rising food and fuel costs. Broader discussions around the meetings warned that tens of millions could fall into food insecurity amid ongoing crises

More generally, Banga emphasized job growth to help address poverty and hunger.  He emphasized that 1.2 billion young people in lower income countries will enter the workforce over the next decade, but current projections suggest only 400 million jobs will be created, creating a massive 800 million job gap.

The World Bank is responding to how the conflict risks driving a record number of people into acute food insecurity, potentially adding 45 million more individuals to the 318 million already facing severe hunger globally if the conflict persists beyond mid-2026.

On other topics, Banga praised India’s digital transformation, citing examples of women farmers using “Small AI” to identify crop diseases, and expressed a desire to scale this technology in emerging markets.

He also highlighted the launch of the World Bank’s new “Water Forward,” a global initiative to improve water security for a billion people by 2030, noting that water is foundational to economic growth and jobs.

Videos:

CNN:  https://www.c-span.org/program/public-affairs-event/world-bank-group-president-ajay-banga-on-his-organizations-priorities/667023

Jobs:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeyO7U0_byY

Crisis response toolkit:  https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4bWFDBKWpyY

Readings:

https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2026/04/19/jobs-water-forward-targets-spring-meetings

https://www.reuters.com/world/world-bank-could-provide-up-100-billion-funds-countries-hit-by-war-banga-says-2026-04-14/

https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2026/04/08/conflict-hits-menaap-economies-underscoring-need-for-action-to-boost-resilience-create-jobs

https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2026/04/08/joint-statement-by-the-heads-of-the-international-monetary-fund-the-world-bank-group-and-the-world-food-programme

In Memoriam: Lionel Rosenblatt, Refugee Champion

April 22, 2026

Lionel Alexander Rosenblatt, born December 10, 1943; died April 11, 2026.

Lionel Rosenblatt was the most consistent, clear, sane voice on behalf of refugees and war victims in Washington, DC, SE Asia, Switzerland and across the humanitarian community during his many years building up the stature of Refugees International (RI), the NGO he led as Executive Director.  During those years he was the most accessible, humane and down to earth of Washington leaders, always putting others at ease while steering conversations with a strong moral compass.

He is survived by his wife of 55 years, Ann Grosvenor Rosenblatt, whom he met in Vietnam and saved from a rhinoceros in Africa; his sister Sarah; and the generations of humanitarian workers he taught, cajoled, inspired, and sent off to places that needed them.

Born in New Rochelle, New York, and educated at Harvard College and Stanford Law School, he entered the U.S. Foreign Service in 1966 beginning a career that would span the fall of Saigon, the Indochinese refugee crisis, the wars in the Balkans, the Rwandan genocide, and crises in Somalia, Chechnya, and the Congo.

He is perhaps best remembered by many for an act of principled insubordination: in April 1975, he and colleague Craig Johnstone defied State Department orders and flew to Saigon on personal leave, arranging the evacuation of 400 greatly at-risk Vietnamese before the city fell as the war came to an end.  Michael Eiland, who succeeded him in Bangkok, says “It was truly a bold and remarkable undertaking and illustrated the depth of Lionel’s moral courage.”  Soon thereafter, Lionel was called before Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in Washington, DC to answer – he thought – for his clear violation of State Department instructions.  He was instead complimented by Kissinger who praised him for doing exactly the right thing.

Selected quotes by Lionel himself:

  • “The treatment of refugees is a measure of whether countries live up to their stated principles.”
  • “It was always a mystery to me why they [the Hmong] were good enough to fight for us but not good enough to consider for resettlement.”. “They were willing to risk everything for us. We should have been willing to do more for them.”
  • “Humanitarian relief cannot substitute for political will. Feeding people under siege while allowing the siege to continue is not a policy—it is an abdication.” (about the crisis in Bosnia and the failure to act).
  • “Governments respond when they are pressed to respond. If they are not pressed, they will do as little as possible.”
  • “The lesson of Rwanda [after the genocide] is not that we did not know; it is that we did not act on what we knew.”
  • “If you go to the field and you see what is happening, you cannot come back and pretend that incremental steps are enough.” And “Working on the ground, listening to the customers, the refugees, and finding out how to help them…”
  • “The most vulnerable are those who have not crossed a border—because they have no legal status and no one assigned to protect them.”
  • “Early action saves both lives and resources; delay multiplies both the human and financial cost.” (From Humanitarian Emergencies: Ten Steps to Save Lives and Resources, 1995)
  • “We have one of the worst refugee crises of modern times — we have hundreds of thousands of people [from Rwanda in DR Congo] — one need not quibble over numbers, but all of us saw the camps — we know there are hundreds of thousands of people formerly supported by all of us as wards of the international community who’ve gone missing and are without food or water now for three weeks from this sector. … [we] must decide to go ahead more aggressively or we’ll really have written off substantial numbers of people to certain death.”
  • “We spend far more responding to crises than we would have spent preventing them.”
  • “You’ve got to be sure that you don’t get killed in the semifinals.”
  • “Our job is not simply to report what we see, but to force those who can act to do so.”
  • “Our enemies were not the Viet Cong… our enemies were the Koreans and the Americans and the South Vietnamese who didn’t like what we’d done.”
  • “Everybody [in the US Government] reported [only] success up the chain of command… so it was very hard for the senior Americans [officials] to know what was really happening.”
  • ”Many experts agree that a force of just 5,000 peacemakers could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives in Rwanda in 1994.”
  • “While the international community is focused on Bosnia, little attention is paid to Burundi, a country that is close to exploding into a frenzy of killing that would dwarf the carnage of the Balkans. The United States should supply logistical and financial backing and solicit troops from other countries, including African nations, such as Botswana and Zimbabwe. The mission: to protect the moderate central government and the operations of foreign relief organizations.”
  • “When the United States leads, others follow; when it hesitates, others find reasons to hesitate as well.”
  • “Because of the funding shortfall, in beleaguered Bosnia meager rations are now being cut by half. In Croatia, the UNHCR has been forced to cut back drastically on support for the 600,000 Bosnian refugees there. … strong U.S. leadership is required to sustain a relief effort that must quickly resume feeding [to avert] the terrible precedent of permitting the remainder of Bosnia to be starved into submission.”
  • “The difference between acting now and acting later is measured in lives.”
  • “My life has always been dictated by strange, unpredictable circumstances.”
  • “You become a crusader for the underdog. And that’s much more satisfying than going to diplomatic functions and having high titles.”
  • “I realized that if I ever have to go on the run again, the quickest way to change my appearance is to have a mustache to shave off.”

Lionel was famous for hard-hitting one-page fax sheets specifying 5-to-10-point plans for immediate action to solve emerging problems.

This box below is from the 1996 Annual Report of Refugees International:

His leadership was moral alertness:  refusal to let distance, numbers, or diplomatic protocol numb the conscience.  He was part of a generation that built the modern humanitarian system, but his particular gift was persistence without cynicism.

Selected quotes by others about Lionel:

“Lionel was a lion hearted and compassionate advocate for refugees and saved so many lives because of his commitment.”  – Patricia Frye Walker

“He was a walking soundbite, able to eloquently and persuasively articulate why aiding others was beyond a moral imperative but of importance for national security at any time.   He had to have one of the world’s best rolodexes. There was almost no one in the humanitarian space he could not get on the phone.  I recall fondly seeing firsthand Lionel’s willingness to forcefully rattle cages and go out on a limb for the sake of those in need. I was in the room at the Orchid Hotel in Bukavu when he was being interviewed by the Washington Post about the ongoing civil war in what became the DRC. During the interview he called for the U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda to be recalled to Washington and read-in on the current US position on the war. The reporter asked Lionel if he really wanted to go on record for saying this. Lionel’s response, “‘You can !@$%ing print it.’  It made the article.”    – Kirkpatrick Day

“He was a giant.”   – Ellen Frost

“Lionel was a powerhouse: loud, bold, principled and fearless. He fought tirelessly for refugees and their human rights. I began my career in the humanitarian sector at Refugees International and Lionel modeled purpose and ferocity in a way that emboldened me to never shy away, to always speak up, to ask the tough questions and be relentless in the pursuit of solutions. So many of us became better advocates and allies because we had the chance to learn from him, to argue with, be challenged and encouraged by him.”  – Joung-ah Ghedini-Williams, former RI field analyst

“He always encouraged me to be bold, go for broke, do whatever our tiny RI team could do to give refugees voice and marshal the support they needed.” – Susan Goodwillie, who preceded Lionel as head of Refugees International

    “Even then he was investing in the next generation of advocates imploring a multilateral organization in which he strongly believed but pushed daily to hold up the 1951 convention and the foundation of international refugee protection.”   – Kelly Clements, Deputy High Commissioner of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

“Lionel Rosenblatt, who led the refugee section [in Cambodia] was incredible, a real dynamo on this disaster. He would call me from a remote area to report that one refugee was being mistreated… He had that unique ability to care as much for one as for a thousand.”  – Ambassador Morton Abramowitz

“At that time, Lionel had very little experience in Laos and almost none with Hmong at the beginning, before ‘75, because his experience was in Vietnam. But he became extremely knowledgeable and very involved, and the key player in all this was Lionel. He was the refugee coordinator, so—and very articulate.  The refugees could not have had a better advocate for them. And this was within the State Department, so it made a big difference.“  – Dennis Grace, RI field advocate

“The enumeration of the sheer volume of his accomplishments is almost overwhelming. It is impossible to convey in words, though, his energy, passion, and selfless dedication to the refugee cause.”   – Michael Eiland, who suceeded Lionel in Bangkok

“Lionel could figure out how to get around problems.  When I needed to figure out how to get rid of landmines in my camp, he got me a landmine detector.  He found people.  He had a huge contact list; he knew people, he raised money for Refugees International.  It had almost been falling apart; he really rescued it.  He spoke straight forward and testified often to Congress. This small group made big changes in the international system.  People trusted him…. I went out to his Llama farm in West Virginia before he took the job at RI.”  – Dr. James Cobey

“Lionel Rosenblatt was a relentless advocate for refugees. He never gave up. An. example. He became a supporter of Hmong refugees who had been supporters of the US during he Vietnam conflict. Being mountain people , a resettlement site in the mountain west would be ideal. That site turned out to be the Bitterroot Mountains of Montana just south of Missoula, my home town.  As the Hmong were mountain people, the Bitterroots were a perfect resettlement site for them. Still, they needed livelihood help. Next thing I knew, Lionel had somehow gotten some llamas and had them sent to Missoula!”  – Don Krumm, former refugee officer at Dept of State

“I think without Lionel Rosenblatt we wouldn’t be here” – Lee Pao Xiong, Hmong leader

“Lionel had three key components of an effective humanitarian advocate — passion, smarts, and heart — and he offers all of us a model of a life well-lived.” – U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Eric Schwartz

“He did a great job leading meetings at the Burundi Policy Forum in the mid to late 1990’s.” – Margaret Zeigler

“Whenever he appeared, it was to encourage people towards engagement, participation, solutions. The message was always clear: we can and must do better.  Lionel Rosenblatt was one of the handful of giants that influenced my career. Just the right suggestion or correction at just the right time, typically without preamble, steered me to better helping others. He wasn’t great at following the status quo and, yeah, I loved that”.  – Bill Hyde, IOM Emergency coordinator

“He was so insightful and so relentless. He was a magnificent person to witness and work with. He was always looking for evidence of wrongdoing by whoever cast the characters in that. He was in there all the time holding up a vision of themselves to themselves and fighting for refugee rights.”  – Don Krumm

“He seemed like a bulldog, a pit bull even, pressing one administration after another to do the right thing on humanitarian issues.”  – John Prendergast

“Rosenblatt displayed special empathy for ethnic minorities whose fates were largely regarded as collateral damage.  These included the Hmong hill-tribe minority in Laos, who served as proxy soldiers for the U.S. in its “Secret War” to support a pro-Western government against the communist Pathet Lao.  – Washington Post

“Lionel’s influence extended well beyond the organization itself. His relationships and advocacy helped connect policymakers to the realities on the ground in conflict zones. Notably, his role in bringing Richard Holbrooke into besieged Sarajevo became part of a chain of events that would later influence U.S. engagement in Bosnia and the eventual Dayton Peace Accords – a powerful example of how principled action can reverberate at the highest levels of policy.” – Refugees International

“His working style as head of Refugees International was to visit areas where conflict was creating refugees and publicize the plight of these individuals not only in Southeast Asia, but the former Yugoslavia, Russia, and Africa, often to the irritation of authorities in the host country and in the United States. His advocacy more than once produced news coverage of events that otherwise might have been overlooked. “Harassing” governments was the term Dick Holbrooke used in his book To End A War about Rosenblatt’s style.”       – Legacy.com

 

Other readings:  Numerous other obituaries provide a chronological litany of his career postings and involvement in different crises.

 https://apnews.com/article/lionel-rosenblatt-obituary-vietnam-war-refugees-hmong-cambodia-5f6056bf5b75173897fc2fca7567d156

 https://www.jstor.org/stable/40209567

 Humanitarian Emergencies: Ten Steps to Save Lives and Resources” (1995)

Interview with Edesia’s Maria Kasparian about Anti-Hunger Foods

April 20, 2026      Plumpy’Nut has become one of the most recognizable tools in the fight against severe acute malnutrition among young children around the world.  Plumpy’Nut is one brand of the broader food type called “Ready to Use Therapeutic Food”, or “RUTF.”  RUTFs have been a key topic in recent articles in Hunger Notes; nonprofits have used RUTFs in the Sudan, Gaza, Haiti, Afghanistan and in other countries in need.

In the United States, one of the leading producers is Edesia, the Rhode Island–based nonprofit that manufactures Plumpy’Nut and related products for UNICEF,  the World Food Programme, and NGO partners, while also participating in a wider global network of therapeutic food producers.
Following are selections from WHES’ interview with Ms. Maria Kasparian, Edesia’s Executive Director in 2023, about Edesia and now head of Strategic Partnerships.  The interview highlights several of these trends: rising interest in alternative formulations using ingredients such as soy, corn, chickpea, or millet; debate over procurement rules; the slow pace of agency adoption; and growing recognition that the challenge is not only making therapeutic food, but also building efficient supply chains that can deliver it where children need it most.

WHES: Thank you so much for taking time out to talk with us today. What should our readers know about Edesia?

Kasparian:  One of Edesia’s mandates is to educate and advocate global nutrition. We have school field trips, work with senators, channel our programming through Scouting America, and we do advocacy work in DC.
We produce in the US, taking with PL 480 (Food Aid) funds. We are producing 1.2 million packets of Plumpy’Nut each day. Edesia has had a ticker of how many children that our products have reached since we started producing in March 2010 – and distributing through partners. Today we are at 19.9 M children reached with full treatments. Our goal is to reach a total of at least 10 M more children within 2023 and 2024.

We’re also part of the “PlumpyField network” of partners in ten partners, spanning Madagascar, India, and other countries. We work to help these producers in other countries, such as Ethiopia and Haiti. For instance, we support Meds and Foods for Kids in Haiti. There are now 22 producers worldwide of RUTF, and each uses slightly different formulations.

WHES: Do all the producers of Ready to Use foods follow the same formulae?

Kasparian: Across the 22 suppliers of foods, there are no two formulas that are identical. But as long as we meet the robust recommendation, we’re okay.
Even within the PlumpyField Network, there are tweaks. There are differences, depending on what’s available locally. For example, you have to achieve certain omega-3 to omega-6 balance with the fats. You need to do that. The vegetable oils are important. You can get different kinds of vegetable oils depending where you are. There might be some variety there. You might have different forms of milk powder available. You might have different forms of whey available that have different amounts of protein. You’ve got to balance the formulas, depending on what ingredients you have available. But they’re very similar. We’ve actually done taste tests where we meet and have everybody’s and we blindly try to guess whose is who. So, they’re a little different, but the difference is small. But the formulations do vary a little bit. There will be a greater degree of difference with those outside the network formulations are.

WHES: Thank you. So, how do donors specify what they want or accept new ideas for specialty foods to address malnutrition?

Kasparian: Well, the Interagency oversight group (UNICEF and WFP) have discussed for many years, having a common standard. It’s the long game. Over time, things do get accepted. Governments and the U.N. don’t move quickly. So generally, though, progress does happen. It just happens slowly. You keep pushing, and over time, things do improve. So you must continue innovating.
The Tufts Food Aid Quality Review study comparing the effectiveness of different foods looked at RUTF (compared Corn Soy Blend or CSB+ with fortified vegetable oil (CSB+ w/oil), Corn soy whey blend (CSWB) with fortified vegetable oil (CSWB w/oil), and Super Cereal Plus with amylase (SC+A)) for the treatment of moderate malnutrition.  The cost-effectiveness was similar between the products, and caregivers had a slightly lower of their own opportunity costs when using RUTF.  The main conclusion was that NGOs/programmers should pick the products that would be most appropriate for their contexts.

WHES: Is it only about the formula of the food composition?

Kasparian: The ecosystem is not only about making RUTF, but also about improving the supply chain. Customs fees for incoming fees mean that local production is not necessarily cheaper. You know, it’s cheaper to get our foods from here to South Sudan than it is from Khartoum to South Sudan. As well, we’re shipping a lot to Somalia right now.

WHES:  Has demand grown for your RUTF?

Kasparian: We have doubled the numbers of kids getting treatment. Most of it goes to Africa, over 70%. Our main goal is to reach more kids. The price of RUTF was going down significantly before the Covid-19 pandemic. As background, 70% is the cost of the ingredients. In 2005 a box of RUTF cost $55 but we brought that down to $35 a box in 2019.

WHES: How is it working with UNICEF and WFP?

Kasparian: One of the barriers we face is the way that Unicef and WFP work together. They work differently and in different places.

WHES: How do you relate to other producers in other countries?

Kasparian: We are a U.S.-based producer. We’re a non-profit U.S.-based producer, and that we care a lot about having a good balance of what’s coming from the U.S. and what is coming from local and regional procurers, and that balance is really important. And we do various things to support these
suppliers in other countries. We work particularly closely with Meds and Food for Kids in Haiti. We help them with their formulations. We just help them to get their codex, upgraded codex specification in order. We help them with procurement of raw materials. We help them troubleshoot from a maintenance engineering perspective.

WHES:   Edesia has a history going back to Tanzania, right?

Kasparian: Yes.  Before we set up a factory in the U.S., we established one in Tanzania, which, unfortunately, is no longer operational, but was, for about five years.  Thus, our experience kind of went that way. Our founder, Navyn Salem, has family roots in Tanzania.  Her father and three generations of the family are Indians who lived in Tanzania for a period of time. Ms. Salem’s father was born and raised in Tanzania before he came to the U.S. on a USAID scholarship for college.  This leads me to another interesting part of the story: USAID is really responsible for Edesia’s existence. Her father, and therefore she, would not be in the U.S. if not for USAID. The U.S. factory, Edesia, was an afterthought to Tanzania because, at the time, USAID’s Food for Peace, was looking to have RUTF and RUSF suppliers in the U.S. because they wanted to be able to use the Title II PL-480 funds for nutrition-specific commodities like RUTF, RUSF. Which, at the time, this is 2008, 2009, at the time, no one was making in the U.S. And there was a push to improve the food aid basket of what was coming out of the U.S. And to take more vulnerable groups into account and to add these nutrition-specific commodities. So, they kind of approached us and others to say, hey, can you do this in the U.S.?

WHES: Do you engage much with the public here in the U.S.?

Kasparian: Our factory doors are open. We have school field trips come through. We have senators and congresspeople whenever we can. We have Scouting America, Rotary Clubs, and the like. And then we also do advocacy work in D.C. around global nutrition.

India’s Conquest of Famine

April 19, 2026     In the weeks since Paul Ehrlich’s passing away, there have been many articles about the change that have occurred since his publication of the Population Bomb, where he warned about trends in risk of famine in India.

Indeed, one of the greatest stories in human history of overcoming food insecurity and famine has been India over the last 50 years. Not only has India grown in terms of food production, but it has diversified its economy, built infrastructure, and increased its GNP, which also supports improvements in long-term resilience.  In the 1990s, India turned away the food assistance provided in large quantities by the US Government’s Food for Peace, and India became itself a food aid donor to other countries.

In the late 1960s, India began intensively experimenting with ways to improve yields of key food crops, particularly wheat.  A few Indian scientists played an historic, important role in feeding this country which today has more people than any other.  The most important was M.S. Swaminathan, an unassuming man who, in his own gentle way, revolutionized India’s agricultural sector.

Swaminathan started out in 1947 working on plant breeding at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) in New Delhi. Swaminathan collaborated with US plant breeder Norman Borlaug touring India, breeding Mexican wheat with Japanese varieties. This new crop produced high yields of good quality.  In 1964 he earned funds to plant demonstration plots which convinced Indian farmers to experiment with its use.  Further experimentation led to wheat varieties which by 1968 increased wheat production to 17 million tons.

Swaminathan’s lifelong commitment to transparency pushed him to establish various systems of accountability of the institutions he headed; therefore, he placed the entire international rice collection under the supervision of an international rice board even though it was already a part of IRRI.  Swaminathan never tired of crediting that the seeds of the green revolution in India were actually sown far back in 1949 in the fields of the Central Rice Research Institute in Cuttack, India long before Norman Borlaug came to India.  Working with the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization, he established a commission for plant-based genetic resources to address issues related to the conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources for food and agriculture. This included plants, animals, and aquatic organisms.  The commission’s focus was on the management of biodiversity.  In the 1980s, Swaminathan led, as Director General, the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Here he shone as a brilliant and dedicated scientist, an excellent leader, and kind-hearted.  Despite occasional setbacks, he persevered in promoting international cooperation in the utilization and conservation of genetic resources.  His vision extended beyond yield per hectare. He was a prophet of sustainability long before it became a buzzword of the 21st century. From championing greater participation of women in agriculture to espousing ecological balance, from advancing research in Russian attics to promoting sustainable coastal farming, from advocating for tribal food security to establishing gene banks for endangered crops, his canvas was vast, and his brush precise. Swami Nathan was generous and humane, embodying the best and noblest of the India into which he was born and by which he was shaped.

As shown in the graph at right, food production in India has more than kept pace with population growth due to ongoing improvements in applications of scientific methods. In these same last fifty years, India’s population hasalmost tripled, from 520,000,000 to about 1.5 billion today.

India’s agricultural geography has shifted from a northwest “Green Revolution core” (1970s) to a much more broad-based and increasingly central/eastern growth pattern (last decade).  In the 1970s, increases in production were largely in the Punjab, Haryana, and Western Uttar Pradesh.   More recently, Indian States with the strongest increases in food production:

    • * Madhya Pradesh – often cited as India’s fastest-growing agricultural state in the 2010s
    • * Chhattisgarh – rapid expansion in rice production and procurement
    • * Jharkhand – gains from irrigation and diversification
    • * Bihar & Eastern Uttar Pradesh – improvements in rice, maize, and horticulture.

The elimination of famine has not meant that there is no malnutrition in India.  Fifty years ago half of children were stunted (low height per age) from undernutrition, while today 1 in three are.

Meanwhile, rate of wasting malnutrition (as measured by weight for height) has remained stubbornly high over the last 50% years, by many estimates stuck in the range of 17-18%.

The government’s most current estimate for the national prevalence of wasting (low weight for height) among children under five in India for 2025 is estimated the 5.4% though estimates from prior years are closer to 18% among children.  Wasting malnutrition also varies across different areas.  For instance, the Union Territory of Lakshadweep reported the highest wasting rate at 11.6%, followed by Bihar (9.31%) and Madhya Pradesh (8.2%).

Much of the growth of production in India has been facilitated by increases in application of synthetic fertilizers. This is relevant today because, as reported yesterday, India’s food economy is seriously dependent upon fertilizers from the Middle East that are now blockaded and will be increasingly expensive, which may challenge food production in India this year.

Read more:   M.S. Swaminathan in conversation with Nitya Rao: The Ethics and Politics of Science, M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation Centre for Research on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, 2014.

Charles C. Mann, The Wizard and the Prophet: Two Remarkable Scientists and Their Dueling Visions to Shape Tomorrow’s World (New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc., 2018).

Priyambada Jayakumar, M S Swaminathan: The Man Who Fed India,  HarperCollins India, September 10, 2025

“Coming Food Crisis” Predicted in Financial Times Essay

April 18, 2026          In a major Weekend Essay, Adam Hanieh, writing in the Financial Times British newspaper on April 17 2025, warns that the current Middle East conflict will cause a world food crisis.  Hunger and even famine are foreseeable consequences of the war on Iran. The world should act to shield the poorest from effects that will continue long after the fighting stops.

The contraction in exports from the Middle East is not just a short-term increase in price for agricutural inputs; it risks actual production shortfalls in upcoming harvests.  Rising energy prices always raise food prices.

Referring to how many countries have improved their food production over the last fifty years, the Financial Times essay explains how inter-connected today’s farms are with products from the Middle East, explaining how the the ‘Green Revolution’ of crop research established a link between food production & the fossil fuel industry across every stage of farming and “pushing back famine” across much of Asia and Latin America.   Since many of these fertilisers are derived from natural gas, the Green Revolution meant that the world’s food production became ever more closely tied to a constantly increasing supply of hydrocarbon inputs.

The author details how sulfur, urrea, and ammonia from the Middle East are key components of farm inputs in China, India, Brazil, Morocco, Indonesia, Australia, the United States and other countries.

This Financial Times piece also explains how trans-shipment hubs, such as Dubai have become important for humanitarian supply chains, which will hinder aid to countries like Somalia and Sudan.

The essay argues that this is a slow-moving yet systemic crisis as farmers plant less now, with resulting smaller harvests months ahead, leading to further increases in food prices later this year.  FT recognizes that poor countries will be hit harvest.  While wealthier countries will experience inflation, low income countries may face famine.

The original author of the FT essay, Adam Hanieh is the director of the SOAS Middle East Institute and professor of political economy.

Note:  This and other Financial Times articles are behind a paywall and not readily accessed absent a subscription.  The link to the article is:

https://www.ft.com/content/36343e24-b06f-434d-a7e5-6046e7bcf3df

 

Further Increases of Starvation in Darfur, Sudan

April 12, 2026

The arid, poor, western region of Sudan, called Darfur, has been a complex emergency for twenty-three years, with mass displacement and an increasing problem of starvation and malnutrition.  Aid to prevent starvation is prevented by the inability of aid agencies to reach those in need, due to violence. A two-year siege of the regional capital of El-Fasher reflected the unending war between the two combatant groups, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the SAF (Sudanese Armed Forces).

Using themal imaging, the Humanitarian Research Lab (HRL) at Yale University has recently published evidence of attacks against civilians Darfur.  Yales’s new HRL report provides detail of targeted burning, destruction and razing of 41 agrarian villages northwest of El-Fasher in darfur.  These communities were ethnically Zaghawa who produce food for the region, but following attacks, they halted agricultural work.  The Yale lab report finds:  “decreases in agricultural activity during the growing period following the razing of communities assessed through year-on-year changes in land use/land cover.”

The Yale lab and this report use remote sensing to measure changes in food security in non-permissive environments.  Satellite imagery of farming communities are shown in the photo at the top-left and at the map at right.

Oona Hathaway has called attention to famine as a war crime in Darfur, western Sudan.  “We conclude that the new Yale HRL report provies compeelling evidence relevant to multiple RSF starvation crises in the vicinity of El-Fasher, including war crimes, crimes against humanity…. Well over 11 million people have been displaced by the conflict, which has caused desperate levels of food insecurity, including multiple determinations of famine.”   She continues, “the fighting and the parties’ well-documented obstruction of humanitarian relief have, for extended periods, made the, made the transportation of food and aid to places that desperately need it nearly impossible.”

The economic and livelihood implications of the crisis have spread beyond the agricultural sector.  “Nearly 70 percent of bank branches have closed and ceased operation in conflict zones across Sudan. Bank closures, limited cash liquidity, and high transfer commission rates ranging from 10 to 30 percent have contribu ted to financial strain and limits any ability to sell and purchase food commodities, exacerbating food insecurity.”

Several locations in Darfur report acute malnutrition rates above 50%, which is very high.  Around 800,000 childhood cases of servere malnutrition, the most dangerous and deadly form of malnutrition, are expected nationwide this year in The Sudan.

Food aid does not benefit from a stable pipeline to Darfur, some food coming from Chad.  Much of the food is brought in by the World Food Programme.  NGOs responding include the Norwegian Refugee Council, CARE, Food for the Hungry and Concern Worldwide.

Following the confirmed spread of famine in North Darfur, Action Against Hunger (AAH or ACF) is operating directly in regional hunger hotspots. Their teams provide emergency health and nutrition interventions, alongside water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) programs that are critical for preventing malnutrition-related diseases like cholera.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has provided food and cash, and health care for livestock, and rehabilitated water infrastructure (e.g., hand pumps in rural North, Central, and West Darfur) benefiting tens of thousands; conducted cholera response campaigns with chlorination and hygiene promotion in Tawila (North Darfur) and Al Daein (East Darfur), reaching over 117,000 people and distributed water filters.

See:

 

Lebanon’s 2026 Conflict and Displacement Increase Malnutrition

April 8, 2026:  An estimated 1.65 million people in Lebanon are vulnerable to increased food shortages and malnutrition due to the combination of conflict, bombardment, displacement and denied access of food shipments. The conflict between Israel and Hezbollah forces in Lebanon has caused significant agricultural damage, estimated at $704 million, and disrupted livelihoods, especially for small-scale farmers.  However, aid agencies have not reported new rates of malnutrition from population-based surveys.

Pre-conflict, children in Lebanon were found to be 36% anemic from iron deficiency, with reduced dietary diversity and high rates of zinc and Vitamin A deficiency.

Daily military strikes and incursions continue, particularly in the south of Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley, preventing people from returning home and resuming their livelihood.  People are sheltering in schools, public spaces, and even their cars, with many shelters already overcrowded. Hotspots include Baalbek, El Hermel, Akkar, Bent Jbeil, Marjaayoun, El Nabatieh, and Sour.  Seven bridges across the Litani River — a key transport corridor linking southern areas to the rest of the country — were struck as of late March 2026, disrupting supply routes for food, fuel, and medical goods.   Retail activity collapsed in conflict zones: only 15% of shops in El-Nabatieh and one-third in South Lebanon remained fully operational.   Markets south of the Litani River largely ceased operations, with many shops closed or evacuated and supply deliveries significantly reduced

More generally, Lebanese also have seen increases in the price of food, which has been affected by the regional conflict and constraints on fuel.  For example, the price of bread increased 8% at subsidized rates but 30% at many bakeries.  The Ministry of Economy increased the price of bread  by 5,000 Lebanese pounds due to rising fuel costs affecting oven operations and flour transportation.

International Aid

As needs have increased, the funding for aid has decreased. Food assistance coverage has dropped by about 45% between 2024 and 2025, forcing the WFP to reduce the number of people it assists by 40%.

Aid agencies that are responding with nutrition, food and health assistance include the Mennonite Central Committee, the Lebanese Red Cross, Action Against Hunger (AAH and ACF), the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, UNICEF, CARE, Caritas, MedAir, and others.

A new digital platform called Sofra is coordinating an innovative response by connecting international donors with local restaurants to prepare and deliver meals to verified shelters. This initiative helps feed displaced families while supporting local businesses and keeping restaurant staff employed.

Huub Lelieveld Honored with World Food Prize for Fighting Food-Borne Illness

The 2026 World Food Prize was awarded to Dr. Huub Lelieveld for his long-term dedication to establishing standards that prevent diseases transmitted through food. Dr. Lelieveld, a Dutch food scientist, promoted the standardization of technologies such as food irradiation and non‑destructive testing—approaches that have prevented millions of illnesses each year, particularly among children, where infections impair nutrient absorption, cause stunting, and exacerbate “hidden hunger” (micronutrient deficiencies).

Lelieveld founded the Global Harmonization Initiative (GHI) in 2004 as a volunteer-led network of more than 1,600 experts from 113 countries to promote science-based standards related to mycotoxins and microbiologically affected food. These standards have reduced unnecessary destruction of safe food at borders and throughout supply chains, increasing the volume of food available globally. GHI’s work has influenced legislation—such as Kenya’s 2023 requirement for certified food safety professionals—and has contributed to the creation of an international alert system for rapid threat response across more than 100 countries.

Lelieveld stated, “My philosophy was: You should not compete on food safety,” and “The Global Harmonization Initiative… strives not only to reach scientific consensus but also to ensure that findings are accessible to everyone.”

He also worked on Safe Cassava and Safe Water projects in sub‑Saharan Africa to combat toxin-related neurological diseases in children and to improve access to clean water, strengthening nutrition in regions where cassava is a staple. His efforts included training more than 4,000 food professionals and supporting “Safe Food Clubs” in schools to teach safe handling practices. He additionally contributed to atmospheric water generation pilots in eight countries to expand access to safe drinking water.

Further information:

https://www.kcci.com/article/scientist-huub-lelieveld-named-2026-world-food-prize-laureate/70848476

https://www.cfr.org/event/2026-world-food-prize-laureate-announcement-and-discussion