Food Fortification Efficiently Prevents Vitamin and Mineral Deficiency

A new analysis of food fortification programs finds that the fortification of consumer foods is cost-effective in the majority of contexts in reducing deficiency diseases of micronutrients (vitamins and minerals).  The findings are available online, as published by Elise Cogo, Ferruccio Pelone, et al in the new edition of the Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 156, Issue 4.

Called a systematic review, the study culled through existing databases to tease out the incremental cost-effectivneess ratios of fortification, by nutrient.  Fifty-six studies were used, drawing on over 200 analyses, covering 63 low or medium income countries.  Not included were biofortification, home fortification, probiotics or pills.

The authors explain, “Large-scale food fortification (LSFF) (conducted at the postharvest, food processing stage) is a system-level intervention defined as, ..deliberately increasing the content of essential micronutrients, i.e., vitamins and minerals (including trace elements), in a food so as to improve the nutritional quality of the food supply and to provide a public health benefit with minimal risk to health”.. Most frequent interventions were as follows: vitamin A, folic acid, iron, and iodine added to cereal grains/products (e.g., flours), oils, and condiments (e.g., sugar, salt).”

The study focused primarily on cost-effectiveness rather than directly measuring health outcomes, but key health benefits are embedded in how cost-effectiveness was calculated.  The key findings include that 84% of analyses found fortification costs less than $1,000 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted (per healthy year of life gained or death prevented) and 58% cost less than $150 per healthy year gained. These are considered very favorable numbers.

Specific nutrients and conditions addressed by the studies included vitamin A deficiency, iron deficiency and anemia, iodine deficiency, neural tube birth defects (linked to folic acid), and conditions like goiter and encephalopathy.

See:  “Cost-Effectiveness of Food Fortification for Reducing Global Malnutrition: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations Across 63 Countries”, Journal of Nutrition https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316626000301?via%3Dihub

Essentials of Public Health Communication: A Valuable Book and Curricula

Around the world, a key shift during the past few decades in combatting malnutrition has been the adoption of social marketing, communications and “behavior change” to improve diets, caretaker behavior,  and recognition of failures in child growth.  The technical book, “Essentials of Public Health Communication” summarizes the state of the art in applying these tools in public health and nutrition.  Written by Claudia Fishman Parvanta, David Nelson, Sarah Parvanta, and Richard Warner.

Chapters walk the reader through implementation, with examples.  One example is the “Folic Acid First Campaign,” convincing women to take a multivitamin with folic acid (or a folic supplement) before they get pregnant.  Television, radio and print messaging should convey a sense of good health, warmth and energy to reduce the chances of birth defects in newborns.

Claudia Parvanta’s background in designing and evaluating health and nutrition social marketing programs in over 20 countries informs the text’s emphasis on using communication to influence dietary behaviors and address hunger-related issues.  The book references other nutrition-related initiatives, such as the Bangladesh Nutrition Education Project, to illustrate how strategic communication plans are developed and implemented in real-world settings.  It walks the reader through formative research methods, such as focus groups, to understand barriers to diet choices.

This 416-page text (published by Jones & Bartlett Learning) is divided into four major sections: Section One: Overview. Chapters 1, 2, and 3 provide an overview of public health communications, the planning, and informatics. Section Two: Informing and Educating People about Health Issues. Chapters 4 through 7 describe communication challenges and methods to provide information in a clear and unbiased manner.

The book analyzes how anti-vaccine content thrives online using emotive narratives and false expertise. It then contrasts this with proactive, empathetic communication strategies from health agencies, such as “pre-bunking” (inoculation theory) and engaging trusted community influencers (e.g., pediatricians, local mothers) as messengers.

The authors frame communication as a core public health function essential for prevention, behavior change, and policy advocacy.  Introduces behavioral and social science theories that guide message design (e.g., risk perception, social norms, diffusion of innovations).  The book includes discussion of media and channel selection and emphases  the 4 “P”s of Social Marketing, namely Product (the idea of being active), Price (reducing social/access barriers), Place (where tweens gather), Promotion (cool, aspirational ads).

Other case examples include the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, the 2014 Ebola scare, and tobacco.  The “Truth” Campaign is described as an anti-tobacco campaign to illustrate audience segmentation and theory application. It didn’t target smokers with health warnings but segmented a new audience  i.e., teenagers, and used the Theory of Reasoned Action/Planned Behavior and empowerment models. The campaign framed tobacco use as a manipulation by big corporations, making rebellion synonymous with not smoking. This showcases moving from “knowledge-attitude-practice” to more sophisticated socio-ecological models.  A full chapter is dedicated to public health informatics which highlights how data systems, surveillance, and digital tools support communication planning and evaluation.

Apropos to its subject, the book reads easily for students and professionals and communicates its messages very well, using a mix of steps, examples, cautions and context.  The book has received very positive reviews, with a 4.5 out of 5-star rating on Amazon.  Reviewers praised it as an excellent resource for nutrition communications and for various types of public health communication work.  It remains the best learning resource in its category.  It is particularly required reading for anyone planning a public health campaign anywhere in the world.