|
|
2002: A BAD YEAR
FOR POOR PEOPLE
The following points
illustrate how 2002 was a bad year for poor
people in developing countries:
- Hunger became widespread in Africa, with
people at risk of
famine increasing from several million to 50 million people [1].
- AIDS increased its grip on the continent, and threatens to
spread rapidly in Asia
1,
2. A
large number of people in Africa-- those infected and
those at risk of being infected-- have not changed
their behavior sufficiently to reduce the HIV
infection rate.
- Conflict continued to
ravage many countries.
- Many-- really most--
governments in developing countries continued to
be controlled by small groups, who benefited
themselves at the expense of everyone else in the
country.
- Developed countries
continued their pursuit of self interest, at best
ignoring developing countries and at worst-- the most
typical case-- pursuing their self interest at the
expense of those countries, which the developed
countries justified as helping developing countries.
(The cloaking of self interest in assistance rhetoric
brought to mind George Orwell's concept of "double
think" [e.g. black is white] in a vivid and concrete
way.)
- A bright spot in the
year appeared to be a large number of international
conferences directed toward the problems confronting
poor people and indeed the world, such as the World
Food Conference, the World Summit on Sustainable
Development held in South Africa, and the
International Conference on Sustainable Development
held in Monterrey, Mexico. The conference
outcomes, however, were pretty much a joke, with by and
large no or very minimal new funding for initiatives,
and many key issues left off the table. Perhaps
the most successful was the Monterrey Conference,
which did succeed in extracting from the United States
a pledge for new development assistance money. The
pledge was obscure; however, pledges of money are not
actual money, and the Bush administration-- (and
Congress, the funding branch of the U.S. government)
has other objectives, all of which Hunger Notes
predicts will sharply reduce the actual cash
forthcoming in 2003 and future years, which will have
the effect of reducing the power of the pledges made
to change the current situation.
Well, what was the good news?
Hunger Notes does not know that there
was much good
news. Some of the positive aspects of the world we did
not really report on in Hunger Notes 2002, such as the
significant contribution of private citizens in the United
States and
elsewhere to NGOs which assist poor people in developing
countries. Such assistance in
the United States now far outstrips development assistance given
through the U.S. government. (The U.S. government, rather than
take the step of increasing its assistance to developing
countries, wants to redefine official development assistance
so as to include the assistance to poor people by ordinary
U.S. citizens, which is a step both deceptive and
clueless as to the desire of U.S. citizens to help those
poorer than themselves). Similarly, and more importantly,
in the developing world, poor people are aware of the
dysfunctional, self-serving, and oppressive nature
of their governments, with their knowledge being a positive force for change.
As we review the articles
published in Hunger Notes in 2002, we are struck by only three
positive elements: 1) that there is some international response
mechanism for issues such as famine and AIDS, 2) that in
Mozambique and Sri Lanka (and perhaps other countries) there
was a diminution of the conflict that has ravaged these
countries, and, 3) (in part by considering Hunger Notes authors
and readers) that there is knowledge-- not nearly as widespread
as it should be-- of the issues that need to be resolved in
favor of poor people, and people willing to try to understand
these issues.
The poorest people of the world do not have a minimally
acceptable life in terms of food, health, shelter, and the
education of their children, and the actions of human beings and
their institutions, considered globally, did not move them
toward such a life in 2002.
Hunger Notes Home Page
Back to Africa Page -
Hunger Notes Home Page
copyright |